Here
are some miscellaneous things I’ve been thinking about—
Politics.
I pay as little attention as possible to the political
campaigns, but from the snippets I pick up Rick Santorum is a nut case. As The Washington Post said recently, Santorum
may appeal to paranoid religious conservatives, but attacks on JFK, apocalyptic
talk of a “war on people of faith,” and calling it snobbery to go to college sound
crazy to most of us. Zealotry won’t gain the votes of moderates and
independents, and it’s they who choose presidents.
As for Mitt Romney, this gaffe-prone stuffed
shirt boasts that his wife drives two Cadillacs, has friends who are NASCAR
team owners (not mere fans), and thinks
$10,000 is a friendly wager. With such credentials he won’t attract many working-class
Americans.
The President should just sit back and
let the Republicans commit unforced errors and disqualify themselves.
A
side note. This
primary campaign foolishness is a direct
result of switching over to the popular election of convention delegates. Yeah,
sure, pure democracy is a great theory. But it requires a well-informed electorate,
which we clearly don’t have given the state of the news media today. (Thank
you, Roger Ailes!) Were we really any worse off when candidates were chosen by
party bosses in smoke-filled rooms?
Health policy. Didja
happen to notice that the Affordable Care Act (the health reform legislation
that will be two years old later this month) has eliminated lifetime limits on
insurance coverage for more than 105 million Americans? No? Well you probably
missed that tidbit because facts and thoughtful analysis aren’t entertaining enough
to make the so-called “news” these days. For those who missed it, here’s the full
meal deal…
Previously, lifetime caps meant that insurance
coverage could run out just when you need it most (e.g., due to a serious
accident or illness). But under the ACA, health plans renewed on or after Sept.
23, 2010 cannot have lifetime limits, and millions of Americans were in such
plans previously. A Kaiser Family Foundation survey showed that 59% of all workers
who had employer-based health insurance had some lifetime limit in 2009, and a
study by the industry group America’s Health Insurance Plans showed that nine out
of ten people who bought individual coverage also had a lifetime limit. When
you run the numbers, you realize that 70 million people in large employer
plans, 25 million in small employer plans, and 10 million with individual policies
had lifetime limits on their health benefits before the Affordable Care Act passed.
Thus 105 million Americans now enjoy
improved coverage without lifetime limits. And Republicans want to repeal “Obamacare.”
I don’t get it.
Universal health coverage. Here’s something else I don’t get — why we don't hear much about a certain politician’s radical proposal for universal healthcare
a few years ago. See if you can identify this socialist-sounding individual. He
wrote:
One of the most
cherished goals of our democracy is to assure every American an equal
opportunity to lead a full and productive life. [W]e have made remarkable
progress toward that goal, opening the doors to millions of our fellow
countrymen who were seeking equal opportunities in education, jobs and voting.
Now it is time that we move forward again in still another critical area: health care. Without adequate health care, no one can make full use of his or her talents and opportunities. …[O]ur present system of health care insurance suffers from two major flaws. First, even though more Americans carry health insurance than ever before, the [millions of] Americans who remain uninsured often need it the most and are most unlikely to obtain it. They include many who work in seasonal or transient occupations, high-risk cases, and those who are ineligible for Medicaid despite low incomes.
Now it is time that we move forward again in still another critical area: health care. Without adequate health care, no one can make full use of his or her talents and opportunities. …[O]ur present system of health care insurance suffers from two major flaws. First, even though more Americans carry health insurance than ever before, the [millions of] Americans who remain uninsured often need it the most and are most unlikely to obtain it. They include many who work in seasonal or transient occupations, high-risk cases, and those who are ineligible for Medicaid despite low incomes.
Second, those Americans who do carry
health insurance often lack coverage which is balanced, comprehensive and fully
protective …. These gaps in health protection can have tragic consequences.
They can cause people to delay seeking medical attention until it is too late.
Then a medical crisis ensues, followed by huge medical bills--or worse. Delays
in treatment can end in death or lifelong disability.
This obviously left-leaning politician went on to propose a “comprehensive
health insurance plan” that would offer universal coverage for all Americans. “Comprehensive
health insurance is an idea whose time has come in America,” he stated. “There
has long been a need to assure every American financial access to high quality
health care. As medical costs go up, that need grows more pressing.”
The time was ripe back then to enact a
plan of universal coverage. It would have been more “radical” than the health
reform law that is now so much despised by Republicans and Tea Party
bloviators. But we don’t hear much about this plan today. Why not? Because its
proponent was Richard Nixon and the year was 1974, the year of Watergate. If
not for that scandal, we would probably have a program of universal health
insurance today, and it would be an accepted part of our national heritage:
something we’re entitled to, like Social Security and Medicare. It would be another
example of pursuing the Founding Fathers’ dream to “promote the general Welfare.”
The happiness project.
In January I wrote about the “happiness class” that my double
cousin Doug Smith teaches at DePauw University and also at the Canyon Ranch resort
a few times each year. Doug recently made a guest appearance on WOSU-FM, the
Columbus, Ohio NPR station. You can hear him talk about what happiness is and
how to get it by clicking here. (The headline has to do with a play about Afghanistan, but click on the green play button below the picture and skip forward to 34:45.)
Doug also wrote to some of his happiness disciples recently about pro
golfer Rory McIlroy, who seems to know a lot about happiness already even
though he’s just 22. In an interview quoted in USAToday Rory compared how he plays the game of golf to Tiger Woods’
approach. He said:
[Tiger] gives out this aura ... ‘I am going to rip
your head off on the first tee.’ I felt like that was the way I needed to
be to win a major. But I quickly found out that that isn’t me and that
isn’t how I play my best golf. That was a big day for me, because I
realized that I don’t need to be anyone else to win golf tournaments. If
I have my own mannerisms and do my own thing and be the person I am, that is
hopefully going to be good enough.
Well, it is good enough, Rory! You're now the #1 ranked golfer in the world.
Doug’s take on this was, “I think what Rory is talking about is loving the game… [and] playing from
something deeper than fear and ego.” The Happiness Project teaches that living
comfortably in one's own skin while avoiding fear and ego are keys to finding
the kind of deep and abiding contentment we all seek.
Peace, y'all!
# # #
Great blog, J. Stuart! Thanks for sharing. Stuart Wesley
ReplyDeleteP.S. Toward the end of his life, Edward Kennedy said the biggest regret of his legislative career was not to embrace the 2/3 loaf of universal healthcare advanced by Milhous Nixon. Get the dough in the oven, and the recipe can be improved on subsequent tries.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteFYI, y'all. J. Stuart didn't write the above comment. It was from my namesake and distant relative, Stuart W. Showalter who lives in Virginia.
ReplyDelete