I just got back from a four-day jaunt through North Carolina, Tennessee and Kentucky--about which more, complete with pictures, in a future post--but first, because I did a fair amount of reading on the trip, I thought I'd comment on Banned Books Week (Sept. 25 - Oct. 2).
It is simply astounding to me that anyone--save perhaps the parent of a young child--should have the power to determine what is morally, politically, or otherwise objectionable for someone else to read. What arrogance that is! What effrontery! What shameless disregard for the human mind!
Not to mention, what folly! Do the self- or government-appointed censors really think they can smother a thought, an idea? Pshaw! How well did they succeed in banning the following books?
Think of the free publicity the authors got from the attendant controversies. Nothing made the 15-year-old me want to read The Catcher in the Rye more than knowledge that someone in "authority" said I shouldn't. (Maybe I should get my textbook banned someplace just to see how much my royalties would increase.)
For an eloquent apologia (formal defense or justification) from a librarian on why a certain book (and, by implication, any book) should not be banned from public libraries please see http://jaslarue.blogspot.com/2008/07/uncle-bobbys-wedding.html.
Finally, I am reminded of the words of James Madison, "Father of the Constitution" and principal author of the Bill of Rights, who wrote that the greatest danger to liberty lies "in the body of the people, operating by the majority against the minority."
The antidote to bad speech is good speech, not censorship.
Stuart
Monday, September 27, 2010
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
More Thoughts on Writing, and Other Stuff
Since my last blog I've had a lot of thoughts about writing:
-thoughts of my own
-ideas from others
-things I've read about
So here goes a somewhat disjointed attempt at making sense of them.
After a month of reading it an hour or so a day, I finished War and Peace. It gave me chills and reminded me of the Russian history and Russian language courses I completed in college.
I also recently worked two full days (8+ hours each) researching and writing something for the next edition of my textbook. When finished, and I'm not done yet, this particular passage will come to about a thousand words on a small question in an arcane area of law: the liaibility of managed care organizations in light of ERISA preemption. Writing is easy. Writing is glamorous.
If it takes me 20 hours or so to write 1,000 as yet unpublishable words on ERISA, think of how long it took Tolstoy to write the 600,000 words of his epic work. And remember, W&P is not just a novel that he dreamed up in his head and committed to paper. It's really more history than fiction. Some call it historial fiction. I would describe it as historiography spiced by fictionalized characters and passages that account for only 20% or so of the book. Even the "fictionalized" accounts are based on his personal wartime experiences in the Crimean War and meticulous research on the Napoleonic Wars of his grandfathers' time. (Remember, W&P--published in the 1860s--concerns Napoleon's disastrous invasion of Russia in 1812.) Tolstoy spent more than five years working on it. So much for writing is easy and glamorous.
Switching gears. My editor once asked me whether I outline the material for my textbook before I actually write it. I thought it funny/peculiar that she would ask, because I seldom outline anything I write. I write like a journalist, which is to say that once I have the lede* sentence or paragraph, the rest just follows naturally. Journalists are taught to structure a story like a pyramid: the lede sentence and paragraph at the top, and details cascading and expanding down to the base. That's usually how I write. The only outline is a rough one in my head.
-----
*Obsolete spelling of lead ("leed"), revived in modern journalism to distinguish the word from "lead" the verb or the metal.
-----
Speaking of funny: a dear old junior high teacher, Ethel Ray (who my mother and her brothers also had in school), used to say there are two kinds of "funny" -- funny ha-ha, and funny peculiar. I've never forgotten that and rarely use the word without thinking of her.
Some writing-related thoughts I've run into:
-thoughts of my own
-ideas from others
-things I've read about
So here goes a somewhat disjointed attempt at making sense of them.
After a month of reading it an hour or so a day, I finished War and Peace. It gave me chills and reminded me of the Russian history and Russian language courses I completed in college.
I also recently worked two full days (8+ hours each) researching and writing something for the next edition of my textbook. When finished, and I'm not done yet, this particular passage will come to about a thousand words on a small question in an arcane area of law: the liaibility of managed care organizations in light of ERISA preemption. Writing is easy. Writing is glamorous.
If it takes me 20 hours or so to write 1,000 as yet unpublishable words on ERISA, think of how long it took Tolstoy to write the 600,000 words of his epic work. And remember, W&P is not just a novel that he dreamed up in his head and committed to paper. It's really more history than fiction. Some call it historial fiction. I would describe it as historiography spiced by fictionalized characters and passages that account for only 20% or so of the book. Even the "fictionalized" accounts are based on his personal wartime experiences in the Crimean War and meticulous research on the Napoleonic Wars of his grandfathers' time. (Remember, W&P--published in the 1860s--concerns Napoleon's disastrous invasion of Russia in 1812.) Tolstoy spent more than five years working on it. So much for writing is easy and glamorous.
Switching gears. My editor once asked me whether I outline the material for my textbook before I actually write it. I thought it funny/peculiar that she would ask, because I seldom outline anything I write. I write like a journalist, which is to say that once I have the lede* sentence or paragraph, the rest just follows naturally. Journalists are taught to structure a story like a pyramid: the lede sentence and paragraph at the top, and details cascading and expanding down to the base. That's usually how I write. The only outline is a rough one in my head.
-----
*Obsolete spelling of lead ("leed"), revived in modern journalism to distinguish the word from "lead" the verb or the metal.
-----
Speaking of funny: a dear old junior high teacher, Ethel Ray (who my mother and her brothers also had in school), used to say there are two kinds of "funny" -- funny ha-ha, and funny peculiar. I've never forgotten that and rarely use the word without thinking of her.
Some writing-related thoughts I've run into:
- James Joyce was once pouring through a dictionary looking for something. He was asked, "Aren't there enough words in there for you?" To which he replied, "No, not the right ones."
- Mark Twain: "The difference between the almost right word and the right word is really a large matter; it's the difference between the lightning bug and the lightning."
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Running Off at the Keyboard
A Few Desultory Thoughts
Nathaniel Hawthorne once said, "Easy reading is damn hard writing." He was right.
2. Thoughts from Eliza P. Doolittle
-go to Russia and China
-write a novel
-finish War and Peace (I'm nearly done at the moment)
1. Thoughts On Writing
After one of my blogs someone complimented me and said, "I wish I could write like that." My first reaction was, "You can. Anyone can." But then I got to thinking: if that's true, why are so many people such dreadful writers? Why can't they put subject and predicate together and make a simple English sentence? There are many answers to this conundrum:
After one of my blogs someone complimented me and said, "I wish I could write like that." My first reaction was, "You can. Anyone can." But then I got to thinking: if that's true, why are so many people such dreadful writers? Why can't they put subject and predicate together and make a simple English sentence? There are many answers to this conundrum:
(a) Good writing takes time, and a lot of folks don't have (or take) the time to write, proofread and re-write, over and over. I'm convinced there's no such thing as good writing ... only good re-writing.
(b) Good writing takes practice and experience. Most of us don't like to practice things, so we don't gain the experience.
(c) Good writing takes discipline and willpower, both of which seem to be in short supply.
(d) Good writing takes caring. Some people simply don't care to write more than short notes or send text messages to their BFF.
(e) Finally, good writing requires clear thinking. Muddled writing usually comes from muddled thinking.
2. Thoughts from Eliza P. Doolittle
Words, words, words, I'm so sick of words!
I get words all day through, first from him, now from you.
Is that all you blighters can do?
I get words all day through, first from him, now from you.
Is that all you blighters can do?
3. Thoughts On Hurricanes
Five years ago Katrina hit Florida then moved on to the Gulf Coast. We all know what she did to Alabama, Mississippi, and especially New Orleans. In 2004 Charley, Frances, and Jeanne hit Central Florida and I felt the full brunt of each of them. Two years ago Gustav came through Baton Rouge and I felt Mother Nature's fury again.
I am so glad I don't have to worry about hurricanes this year!
4. Thoughts On Bucket Lists
I got my Georgia driver's license today (only about 5 months late). I checked it off my "to-do list." Then a brief thought chain reminded me of my bucket list and the fact that I've also checked off a few things from that list in recent years:
-drove the Pacific Coast Highway from SF to Seattle
-went skydiving and hot-air ballooning
-went skydiving and hot-air ballooning
-rode in a glider
-flew in a helicopter (twice)
-flew in a helicopter (twice)
-saw the Last Supper in Milan and David in Florence
-had cappuccino in the Piazza San Marco, Venice
-saw what's left of the Berlin wall
-started working at something I truly love doing
-saw what's left of the Berlin wall
-started working at something I truly love doing
But there are other things I want to do:
-visit the two states I've never seen (No. Dak. and Alaska)-go to Russia and China
-write a novel
-finish War and Peace (I'm nearly done at the moment)
There are lots more, but the point is that bucket lists are fun. Just don't think that when you check off the last item it's time to go. The list is never-ending.
5. Thoughts On Entrepreneurship
My son Scott has some clever friends who've done well in business. A couple of them were the founders of PayPal, for example, and two others have come up with an iPad case. [It's called a "DODOcase" and if you're interested it can be seen at http://www.dodocase.com/.]
I don't have an iPad, but if I did I'd get one of these cases 'cause they look pretty cool. (And, by the way, promotional considerations have not been paid for this endorsement.)
Anyway, the point of this is that I admire people who have innovative minds and entrepreneurial spirits. I'm not inclined that way, unfortunately, but perhaps I should add to my bucket list an item that says: "invent something that people actually buy." (Or at least: "partner with someone who does." LOL)
6. And Finally...
Back to point #1, the idea that writing takes time and effort. I actually whipped this blog out pretty quickly ... it only took about two hours and 15 minutes. :-)
Write on!
Wednesday, August 18, 2010
I Am A Web
I saw something in the paper about Simon and Garfunkel recently. I don't remember a thing it said. All I remember is that the words to "I Am A Rock" came back to me and wouldn't leave:
I have no need of friendship; friendship causes pain.
It's laughter and it's loving I disdain.
I am a rock.
I am an island.
...
And a rock feels no pain;
And an island never cries.
These lyrics started me to thinking about all the people we encounter in the course of a lifetime. Some are passersby on the street or strangers in an elevator--people we will never know and will never see again. Others are people who, like our parents, were just always there; people we never didn't know.
Take my friend Dan, for example. His parents and mine were close friends in Terre Haute. We are the same age. We went to elementary and secondary schools together. We lived about 50 yards apart in college. I've never not known Dan, and if I were to see him today we'd pick up again as if it had only been yesterday. He's not famous, but he's important ... to me.
We all have "Dans" in our lives, and we all have met some famous people too. I used to work for a Congressman, shook hands with a pope, was on a first-name basis with a guy who is now the Cardinal Archbishop of Detroit. I was host to Maya Angelou at a convention for two days. I had Sen. Richard Lugar speak at my fraternity when he was mayor of Indianapolis. (I saw him on an airplane a few years ago and we chatted briefly; he still remembers me and that day 40+ years ago.)
These things don't make me important; everyone has brushes with fame. My older son Scott has worked with Fmr. Sec. of State Warren Christopher and Chief Justice John Roberts, younger son Steve with Meryl Streep and Steven Sondheim. Shown in time-lapse, anyone's life would reveal some celebrities stroboscopically. But most of the people in the film would be just regular folk--neighbors, people at work, golfing buddies, the mailman.
If we could plot all our connections--the anonymous, the regulars, and the illuminati--what a complex web it would be. Imagine the thousands of points on that graph. There would be thick, solid lines to family and good friends and bold font for the most dear. Perhaps we would use dotted lines for the departed and bold italic for famous people (whose names we'd put in red if we actually got to know them a bit).
But most of all there would be thin lines to tens of thousands of question marks for the passersby and the strangers in elevators: ordinary people of all sizes, colors, and religions who are just HERE with us in this time and place. They're constants, part of our rock, living on our island, in this organism called life.
I have no need of friendship; friendship causes pain.
It's laughter and it's loving I disdain.
I am a rock.
I am an island.
...
And a rock feels no pain;
And an island never cries.
These lyrics started me to thinking about all the people we encounter in the course of a lifetime. Some are passersby on the street or strangers in an elevator--people we will never know and will never see again. Others are people who, like our parents, were just always there; people we never didn't know.
Take my friend Dan, for example. His parents and mine were close friends in Terre Haute. We are the same age. We went to elementary and secondary schools together. We lived about 50 yards apart in college. I've never not known Dan, and if I were to see him today we'd pick up again as if it had only been yesterday. He's not famous, but he's important ... to me.
We all have "Dans" in our lives, and we all have met some famous people too. I used to work for a Congressman, shook hands with a pope, was on a first-name basis with a guy who is now the Cardinal Archbishop of Detroit. I was host to Maya Angelou at a convention for two days. I had Sen. Richard Lugar speak at my fraternity when he was mayor of Indianapolis. (I saw him on an airplane a few years ago and we chatted briefly; he still remembers me and that day 40+ years ago.)
These things don't make me important; everyone has brushes with fame. My older son Scott has worked with Fmr. Sec. of State Warren Christopher and Chief Justice John Roberts, younger son Steve with Meryl Streep and Steven Sondheim. Shown in time-lapse, anyone's life would reveal some celebrities stroboscopically. But most of the people in the film would be just regular folk--neighbors, people at work, golfing buddies, the mailman.
If we could plot all our connections--the anonymous, the regulars, and the illuminati--what a complex web it would be. Imagine the thousands of points on that graph. There would be thick, solid lines to family and good friends and bold font for the most dear. Perhaps we would use dotted lines for the departed and bold italic for famous people (whose names we'd put in red if we actually got to know them a bit).
But most of all there would be thin lines to tens of thousands of question marks for the passersby and the strangers in elevators: ordinary people of all sizes, colors, and religions who are just HERE with us in this time and place. They're constants, part of our rock, living on our island, in this organism called life.
Monday, August 16, 2010
Saturday, August 14, 2010
Uneasy Lies the Head that Wears the Crown
I haven't blogged for a while, so allow me to play catch-up.
We just returned from Daytona Beach, site of the memorial services for my father. He and Mom lived there for 27 years, and he wanted to be remembered in that special place. So one morning, just as Rosy Fingered Dawn etched her name across the sky, a handful of us, remembering the "dust to dust" story in Genesis, waded knee-deep into the waves and committed his ashes to the sea.
As my brother-in-law, Rev. Kris Hayden, said in his seaside homily, "The rhythm of the waves and the changing tides are metaphors for our lives. We are born, we live, we die, and life begins again beyond earthly existence. John has become part of our lives in new ways. He is with us through memory and the ongoing consequences of his love for us. The constant breeze at this seashore connects us to this spiritual experience."
Just then, as the sky brightened, a few sun pillars radiated from the horizon and a red-orange crown marked the time of Dad's passage beyond our ken.
Later that day we gathered at the church Mom and Dad had attended, and Kris presided over a special "Celebration of Life" service. More than sixty friends and family came from all over the country: from Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Missouri, Arkansas, Texas, California, Washington State, and of course Florida. Dad's beloved sister Elaine and my cousin Carol were there in spirit, and they called us minutes before the service to send their love from Lake George. Cousins Barbara and Steve Smith came to represent their mother in person and to read her remembrance of her "little brother." There too were condo neighbors, country club golfing buddies, and one of Dad's life-long friends from their days together in high school: Webster Groves, MO, class of 1934! The condo maintenance man (with whom Dad worked on many projects over the years) said afterward that he wouldn't have missed it for anything, so great was his fondness for my father.
During the service I was sitting in the front pew, so I wasn't aware that while Dad's violin teacher played Glazounow's Meditation, two of his great granddaughters danced quietly in the aisle. They repeated their performance later when the family (some 30 of us) gathered for a private dinner at the hotel. After dinner we recalled some of the historic events that occurred during Dad's long life: the Russian Revolution, the "Roaring Twenties," the Great Depression, World War II, Korea, the Cold War, the turbulent sixties, man on the moon, resignation of a president, impeachment of another, election of the first person of color to that office. We remembered also the advances that were made in the field of medicine: the discovery of penicillin, victory over polio, organ transplants, coronary bypass surgery, artificial joints, MRIs and CAT scans, deciphering the human genome, and many more.
And we talked of the many roles my father occupied at various times in his life: flight surgeon, accomplished violinist, choir member, Rotary Club president, golfer, tennis player, pilot, hunter, farmer, builder, wood-worker, quick wit, and physician to generations of Indiana families. He was even, briefly in the 60s, a TV talk-show host!
In addition to it all -- and herein lies the reason for the Shakespearean headline above -- since my grandfather's death Dad reigned as the "patriarch" of our clan. When I mentioned this at the dinner somebody immediately pointed out that the title now devolves upon me. I tried to pass it off to cousin Steve or my Uncle Fred, both of whom are older and wiser than I, but as they are Smiths and not Showalters, the attempt to abdicate was denied.
The responsibilities are many, the shoes too big to fill. The crown is heavy and fits but awkwardly. I am not worthy, yet I will try.
Stuart
We just returned from Daytona Beach, site of the memorial services for my father. He and Mom lived there for 27 years, and he wanted to be remembered in that special place. So one morning, just as Rosy Fingered Dawn etched her name across the sky, a handful of us, remembering the "dust to dust" story in Genesis, waded knee-deep into the waves and committed his ashes to the sea.
As my brother-in-law, Rev. Kris Hayden, said in his seaside homily, "The rhythm of the waves and the changing tides are metaphors for our lives. We are born, we live, we die, and life begins again beyond earthly existence. John has become part of our lives in new ways. He is with us through memory and the ongoing consequences of his love for us. The constant breeze at this seashore connects us to this spiritual experience."
Just then, as the sky brightened, a few sun pillars radiated from the horizon and a red-orange crown marked the time of Dad's passage beyond our ken.
Later that day we gathered at the church Mom and Dad had attended, and Kris presided over a special "Celebration of Life" service. More than sixty friends and family came from all over the country: from Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Missouri, Arkansas, Texas, California, Washington State, and of course Florida. Dad's beloved sister Elaine and my cousin Carol were there in spirit, and they called us minutes before the service to send their love from Lake George. Cousins Barbara and Steve Smith came to represent their mother in person and to read her remembrance of her "little brother." There too were condo neighbors, country club golfing buddies, and one of Dad's life-long friends from their days together in high school: Webster Groves, MO, class of 1934! The condo maintenance man (with whom Dad worked on many projects over the years) said afterward that he wouldn't have missed it for anything, so great was his fondness for my father.
During the service I was sitting in the front pew, so I wasn't aware that while Dad's violin teacher played Glazounow's Meditation, two of his great granddaughters danced quietly in the aisle. They repeated their performance later when the family (some 30 of us) gathered for a private dinner at the hotel. After dinner we recalled some of the historic events that occurred during Dad's long life: the Russian Revolution, the "Roaring Twenties," the Great Depression, World War II, Korea, the Cold War, the turbulent sixties, man on the moon, resignation of a president, impeachment of another, election of the first person of color to that office. We remembered also the advances that were made in the field of medicine: the discovery of penicillin, victory over polio, organ transplants, coronary bypass surgery, artificial joints, MRIs and CAT scans, deciphering the human genome, and many more.
And we talked of the many roles my father occupied at various times in his life: flight surgeon, accomplished violinist, choir member, Rotary Club president, golfer, tennis player, pilot, hunter, farmer, builder, wood-worker, quick wit, and physician to generations of Indiana families. He was even, briefly in the 60s, a TV talk-show host!
In addition to it all -- and herein lies the reason for the Shakespearean headline above -- since my grandfather's death Dad reigned as the "patriarch" of our clan. When I mentioned this at the dinner somebody immediately pointed out that the title now devolves upon me. I tried to pass it off to cousin Steve or my Uncle Fred, both of whom are older and wiser than I, but as they are Smiths and not Showalters, the attempt to abdicate was denied.
The responsibilities are many, the shoes too big to fill. The crown is heavy and fits but awkwardly. I am not worthy, yet I will try.
Stuart
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
Bogus Emails and How to Stop them
For a couple of years now I have been blogging about chain emails, especially the type that:
- come from a friend of a friend;
- have been forwarded numerous times;
- are about politics, religion, or patriotism; and/or
- contain right-wing conspiracy theories or similar fringe ideas
- have been forwarded numerous times;
- are about politics, religion, or patriotism; and/or
- contain right-wing conspiracy theories or similar fringe ideas
I really enjoy debunking these things, and I did so again yesterday in "Friend of a Friend Has No Shame." After reading that post, a couple of people asked for pointers on how they too can help expose and ridicule the crazy, pretentious, or malicious messages that populate their in-boxes. For what they're worth, here are my thoughts:
- Read the excellent article, "That Chain E-mail Your Friend Sent to You Is (Likely) Bogus. Seriously." at factcheck.org (see link below). [Some of the following ideas come from that article, which was posted March 18, 2008.]
- Be suspicious of any message the author of which is anonymous or supposedly a famous person.
- Be wary if the message is full of exclamation points or errors in spelling and grammar.
- If there's math involved, check the math yourself.
- If the message asserts that is it true, it probably isn't. (For example: "This is NOT a hoax!")
- Finally, as the factcheck.org article suggests, the more times something is forwarded, the more likely it is to be false.
factcheck.org
snopes.com
truthorfiction.com
urbanlegends.com
Of course the easiest way to deal with these silly hoaxes is this: just hit the "delete" key.
Monday, June 14, 2010
Reflections on Disappointment
I fear writing things that are inane or banal. To paraphrase Dorothy Parker, such material should not be tossed aside lightly; it should be thrown with great force. So it is with some considerable trepidation that I approach the following mundane, ordinary, humdrum, self-evident, tell-me-what-I-don't-already-know, inane and banal proposition: "Life is Full of Disappointments."
My father had a motto: "People are no damn good." He would say this with a twinkle in his eye and an impish grin on his face because he didn't totally believe it. But I think it was his way of anticipating disappointment. He knew that if we continually depend on other people for our happiness and well being, we will eventually get screwed because even our closest friends and family members will fail us sometimes. Reminding himself that "people are no damn good" was his way of preparing for those times when people would live down to his expectations of them.
I remember Dad's motto because in recent days I have been a sounding board for a number of friends who've suffered some significant disappointments. These were not simple things like losing a bet or not getting a job. Each one involved the person's hopes and dreams being dashed by someone who had not lived up to expectations. Through no fault of their own, my friends felt let down, frustrated, defeated, or demeaned. And they let disappointment, resentment, or anger eat at them.
Lord knows I am no psychologist, but I think it is a spiritual axiom that whenever I am disturbed, no matter what the cause, there's something wrong with me. If someone offends me or makes me angry, I am in the wrong too.
When I first heard that concept I thought, "You're nuts! It's the other guy's fault. He made me feel this way." But upon reflection I came to realize that nobody can make me angry or upset unless I permit them to. My response to a situation is what matters, and the choice is mine. As Prince Hamlet says about Denmark, "There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so." (Hamlet, Act II, scene 2.)
Another Psych 101 principle is that most anger comes from fear. I don't mean real "fight or flight" fear, but fear based on imagined threats. In my friends' situations the fear boiled down to a kind of separation anxiety. People whom they cared about had betrayed a trust or ended a relationship, and my friends were afraid of being emotionally alone. This phantom fear turned into anger, and thus they let a situation they had no control over gnaw away at their insides.
Kahlil Gibran wrote in The Prophet, "Much of your pain is self-chosen." Proverbs says, "As a man thinketh in his heart, so is he." The Serenity Prayer asks for wisdom to distinguish between what we can change and what we can't. Self-help guru Stephen Covey distinguishes between the Circle of Influence and the Circle of Concern (respectively, the things we can control and those we can't).
However you express it, the point is that I have little or no control over what other people do or think. The irony is, however, that the better I am at dealing with what I can control (i.e., myself and my reactions to situations) the wider is my circle of influence and greater are the effects I can have on other people through my example.
If this little essay seems elementary (inane or banal), just consider it another exercise in dealing with disappointment. But if you find a grain of truth here, pass it along to the many of our fellow humans who frequently feel let down by others and who, therefore, are in a perpetual funk about things they can't control.
___
P.S. The following is from Stephen R. Covey's The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Covey writes, "Proactive people focus their efforts on their Circle of Influence. They work on the things they can do something about: health, children, problems at work. Reactive people focus their efforts in the Circle of Concern--things over which they have little or no control: the national debt, terrorism, the weather." To this latter circle I would add: other people.
My father had a motto: "People are no damn good." He would say this with a twinkle in his eye and an impish grin on his face because he didn't totally believe it. But I think it was his way of anticipating disappointment. He knew that if we continually depend on other people for our happiness and well being, we will eventually get screwed because even our closest friends and family members will fail us sometimes. Reminding himself that "people are no damn good" was his way of preparing for those times when people would live down to his expectations of them.
I remember Dad's motto because in recent days I have been a sounding board for a number of friends who've suffered some significant disappointments. These were not simple things like losing a bet or not getting a job. Each one involved the person's hopes and dreams being dashed by someone who had not lived up to expectations. Through no fault of their own, my friends felt let down, frustrated, defeated, or demeaned. And they let disappointment, resentment, or anger eat at them.
Lord knows I am no psychologist, but I think it is a spiritual axiom that whenever I am disturbed, no matter what the cause, there's something wrong with me. If someone offends me or makes me angry, I am in the wrong too.
When I first heard that concept I thought, "You're nuts! It's the other guy's fault. He made me feel this way." But upon reflection I came to realize that nobody can make me angry or upset unless I permit them to. My response to a situation is what matters, and the choice is mine. As Prince Hamlet says about Denmark, "There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so." (Hamlet, Act II, scene 2.)
Another Psych 101 principle is that most anger comes from fear. I don't mean real "fight or flight" fear, but fear based on imagined threats. In my friends' situations the fear boiled down to a kind of separation anxiety. People whom they cared about had betrayed a trust or ended a relationship, and my friends were afraid of being emotionally alone. This phantom fear turned into anger, and thus they let a situation they had no control over gnaw away at their insides.
Kahlil Gibran wrote in The Prophet, "Much of your pain is self-chosen." Proverbs says, "As a man thinketh in his heart, so is he." The Serenity Prayer asks for wisdom to distinguish between what we can change and what we can't. Self-help guru Stephen Covey distinguishes between the Circle of Influence and the Circle of Concern (respectively, the things we can control and those we can't).
However you express it, the point is that I have little or no control over what other people do or think. The irony is, however, that the better I am at dealing with what I can control (i.e., myself and my reactions to situations) the wider is my circle of influence and greater are the effects I can have on other people through my example.
If this little essay seems elementary (inane or banal), just consider it another exercise in dealing with disappointment. But if you find a grain of truth here, pass it along to the many of our fellow humans who frequently feel let down by others and who, therefore, are in a perpetual funk about things they can't control.
___
P.S. The following is from Stephen R. Covey's The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Covey writes, "Proactive people focus their efforts on their Circle of Influence. They work on the things they can do something about: health, children, problems at work. Reactive people focus their efforts in the Circle of Concern--things over which they have little or no control: the national debt, terrorism, the weather." To this latter circle I would add: other people.
# # #
Friend of a Friend Has No Shame
It's been a while since I've commented anywhere about bogus claims made in emails. I used to have a blog called "Stupid Email Forwards" to discredit such stuff, but it wasn't worth it. Like oil in the gulf, lies and misinformation gush out too fast to be stanched by one person's efforts.
These days, however, I'm writing articles about health reform for a national association, so when I came across the following message I couldn't help but do a little investigating. Here's what the incoming "friend of a friend" email says:
"I just got this from a friend and am passing it on to you for your information. This is supposed to be part of the new Health Care Bill that will be starting next year. I thought Obama was just going to raise taxes on people making 250,000 or more? Well this isn't a tax increase but when you take away, Tax Exemption, it will sure feel like a tax increase....
"You will be required to pay taxes on a large sum of money that you have never seen. ... Not believing this I researched the summaries and here's what I read:
"Sec.9002 'requires employers to include in the W-2 form of each employee the aggregate cost of applicable employer sponsored group health coverage that is excludable from the employee's gross income.'
"Joan Pryde is the senior tax editor for the Kiplinger letters. Go to Kiplingers and read about 13 tax changes that could affect you. Number 3 is what I just told you about. Why am I sending you this? The same reason I hope you forward this to every single person in your address book. People have the right to know the truth because an election is coming in November. Here's some of the CHANGE for you."
This, of course, is BS. I have the health reform law in front of me, and all section 9002 does is require information about so-called "cadillac health plans" to be included on W-2 forms. W-2s are information forms. Just because something is reported there doesn't make it taxable. Any tax that is owed will be paid by the employer, not the employee. (See section 9001.)
Joan Pryde at Kiplinger knows this, of course. As recommended, I went to her article and "Number 3" reads: "A requirement that businesses include the value of the health care benefits they provide to employees on W-2s, beginning with W-2s for 2011. The amount reported is not considered taxable income." (Emphasis mine.) So much for people having the right to know the truth.
Finally, "Friend of a Friend" conveniently omits the lead paragraph of Ms. Pryde's article, which I quote:
"The new health care reform law is chock-full of new taxes and tax increases that will affect many individuals and businesses, but it will be years before most of these hikes take a bite out of your -- or your company’s -- wallet. The law also has tax breaks to help both individuals and small businesses pay for insurance."
Saturday, May 15, 2010
Finding Happiness
A member of the family asked me recently, "What makes you happy?" Coming as it did just 10 days after my father's death, the question got me thinking: what is happiness, anyway?
George Burns famously said that happiness is having a large, loving, caring, close-knit family ... in another city. <buh-dum-bum!>
But seriously folks, where does one find happiness? I looked in a dictionary, where happiness is "deep pleasure in, or contentment with, one's circumstances; an instance of this." Ironically, that definition leaves me rather discontented. Unhappy, I guess you could say.
I looked on Google, where I got over 73 million hits in 0.2 seconds: happiness quotes, happiness websites, and "The Happiness Project." Tons of happiness poems, articles, books, and videos. There's Happiness Magazine, which promises: "Find real happiness, sign up today!" Happiness is a booming business, apparently.
There are even college courses and seminars on happiness. My cousin Doug teaches a superb one during Winter Term at DePauw University. (I thank him for sharing his notes, on which some of these thoughts are based.) Doug notes that despite all the progress society has made in the last century, we seem to be no happier than our forebears. He adds that although we have more leisure time, "a life of leisure does not often lead to a life of happiness." Although we have more wealth, "prosperity is not buying us happiness."
The great philosopher Weird Al Yankovic weighed in on the subject when he sang, "If money can't buy happiness, I guess I'll have to rent it." But I don't 'buy' that idea either. <another drum roll and rim shot, please>
So where does one find happiness? Some find it in prayer. Others in meditation. Twelve-steppers credit their Higher Power. Many say you can't seek it, you can only let it happen as the byproduct of a meaningful life. So here are a few meaningful things that have given me that byproduct recently:
Stuart
~~~~
By the way:
"It is impossible for a lover of cats to banish these alert, gentle, and discriminating little friends, who give us just enough of their regard and complaisance to make us hunger for more."
--Agnes Repplier
George Burns famously said that happiness is having a large, loving, caring, close-knit family ... in another city. <buh-dum-bum!>
But seriously folks, where does one find happiness? I looked in a dictionary, where happiness is "deep pleasure in, or contentment with, one's circumstances; an instance of this." Ironically, that definition leaves me rather discontented. Unhappy, I guess you could say.
I looked on Google, where I got over 73 million hits in 0.2 seconds: happiness quotes, happiness websites, and "The Happiness Project." Tons of happiness poems, articles, books, and videos. There's Happiness Magazine, which promises: "Find real happiness, sign up today!" Happiness is a booming business, apparently.
There are even college courses and seminars on happiness. My cousin Doug teaches a superb one during Winter Term at DePauw University. (I thank him for sharing his notes, on which some of these thoughts are based.) Doug notes that despite all the progress society has made in the last century, we seem to be no happier than our forebears. He adds that although we have more leisure time, "a life of leisure does not often lead to a life of happiness." Although we have more wealth, "prosperity is not buying us happiness."
The great philosopher Weird Al Yankovic weighed in on the subject when he sang, "If money can't buy happiness, I guess I'll have to rent it." But I don't 'buy' that idea either. <another drum roll and rim shot, please>
So where does one find happiness? Some find it in prayer. Others in meditation. Twelve-steppers credit their Higher Power. Many say you can't seek it, you can only let it happen as the byproduct of a meaningful life. So here are a few meaningful things that have given me that byproduct recently:
- My various writing projects
- Classical music
- Reading a good book
- Water seen through trees
- The companionship of cats
- A nice meal my mother cooked
- Watching my nephews' track meet
- Helping a friend
- Comforting a dying loved one
- Albert Einstein wrote, "If you want to live a happy life, tie it to a goal, not to people or things."
- The essayist Agnes Repplier (1855-1950) wrote, "It is not easy to find happiness within ourselves, and it is not possible to find it elsewhere."
- According to an old Tibetan saying, "Seeking happiness outside oneself is like waiting for sunshine in a cave that faces north."
Stuart
~~~~
By the way:
"It is impossible for a lover of cats to banish these alert, gentle, and discriminating little friends, who give us just enough of their regard and complaisance to make us hunger for more."
--Agnes Repplier
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

